InvestorsHub Logo

PhenixBleu

07/01/20 8:50 PM

#45502 RE: Coreton #45501

Nope. The docket contains the facts. Note the word REPLY.

Case law is clearly in Rontan's filings.

Also, the correct spelling is counsel, not council.

DE 232 07/01/2020
RESPONSE in Opposition re 222 MOTION to Set Aside Default Final Judgment and Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Global Digital Solutions, Inc. Replies due by 7/8/2020.

This is Rontans motion. They don’t get to “reply” to GDSIs Response unless the Judge orders a hearing and oral arguments, which I seriously doubt.

Rontan has failed to support their motion with a single relevant case study or matter of law by which the Default Judgement can be set aside. Their motion will be summarily denied or outright dismissed IMHO.

Jd6981

07/01/20 9:03 PM

#45503 RE: Coreton #45501

C is looks like the brothers know they have lost this case but keep using every trick in their bag to keep delaying the final settlement. This is total BS and the judge needs to stop their silly games and close this case in July 2020.