InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 8868
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: Coreton post# 45501

Wednesday, 07/01/2020 8:50:40 PM

Wednesday, July 01, 2020 8:50:40 PM

Post# of 50023
Nope. The docket contains the facts. Note the word REPLY.

Case law is clearly in Rontan's filings.

Also, the correct spelling is counsel, not council.

DE 232 07/01/2020
RESPONSE in Opposition re 222 MOTION to Set Aside Default Final Judgment and Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Global Digital Solutions, Inc. Replies due by 7/8/2020.

This is Rontans motion. They don’t get to “reply” to GDSIs Response unless the Judge orders a hearing and oral arguments, which I seriously doubt.

Rontan has failed to support their motion with a single relevant case study or matter of law by which the Default Judgement can be set aside. Their motion will be summarily denied or outright dismissed IMHO.