Replies to post #627484 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[dimples52]

Nope...what really hurts is 12 years and no indication of receiving any money soon. The debate back and forward means nothing if we don't have any information from the ones in control that we will be paid.

[Large Green]

Why do the UWs keep challenging Alice if there is nothing there? Lawyers do NOT litigate or challenge if the return is ZERO, so why have they not ended their predicament long ago?

Also, remember, these same UWs received an additional year to sign releases. Why was this? My answer, so Rosie could get rid of SG who would have challenged the Stipulation and once SG was gone, there was no one to defend Equity except Rosie, so like I said no one to defend Equity?

These same underwriters (below) have underwritten many other MBS Trusts for other failed banks in the past and they know the process and know how to get paid from bankruptcy-remote MBS Trusts.
5) So, all the big players: Bonderman et. al., Grayken et. al., Savitz et. al., Tepper et. al., the other SNHs (Aurelius, Owl Creek, Centerbridge), and all the other Hedge Funds, and of course currently the Underwriters are all Class 19 Equity Escrow Marker Holders.

Could this be the real reason...there is LARGE GREEN in class 19.


We wait with the UW's so why are they still challenging Alice at the Third Circuit Delaware Cout of Appeals?

The real tell are the same UWs whose names follow and their investment decisions within class 19 and/or Preferred Equity positions.

I truly love being attached to their coattails since they do this kind of work and know where the Golden Eggs are located - Class 19!


5) So, all the big players: Bonderman et. al., Grayken et. al., Savitz et. al., Tepper et. al., the other SNHs (Aurelius, Owl Creek, Centerbridge), and all the other Hedge Funds, and of course currently the Underwriters are all Class 19 Equity Escrow Marker Holders.

Have I told you lately how much more, more and more I love my timely signed Preferred Equity ShareMarker positions?


ILLEGAL DILUTION of POR

Very Simple Explanation that Rosie or the UWs WILL NOT address Because They CANNOT Defend Violating the Final POR

1) Amended POR 7 finalized by the court on 2/23/2012 very clearly says the preferred shares in class 19 CANNOT be diluted but common shares in class 22 CAN BE diluted

2) Rosie gave the UWs an extra year to release and it is very clear why...this gave Rosie time to get rid of the EC's legal representation who was SG and this illegal action of diluting preferred would have never been allowed

3) Amended POR 7 preferred shares were illegally diluted and nothing anyone can say can change history, thus THEY WERE CAUGHT AGAIN Performing an ILLEGAL ACTION