Replies to post #2833 on NetList Inc (NLST)

[mejerrylee]

Thanks for posting,

seems just like a matter of time. A lottery ticket here but it appears NLST has some of the numbers. We will see. I think NLST filed against another company also so maybe one company will settle before it becomes more costly.

Go NLST

[Trend-Setter]

Rule 36 JUDGMENT

* Rule 36 affirmance is a quick and clean decision
* Nearly impossible to challenge by rehearing
* Nearly impossible to seek Supreme Court certiorari

https://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://udayton.edu/law/_resources/documents/pilt_2019_seminar_materials/pilt_galluzzo_federal_circuit_rule36.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj6xsaMr4fqAhUc4OAKHSbNDA8QFjACegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw2gDMyn1daxonl5AKijgFaQ&cshid=1592346006394

The Affirmance/Judgment
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/19-1720.RULE_36_JUDGMENT.6-15-2020_1603464.pdf

Netlist Prevails against Google at the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 16, 2020 / Netlist, Inc. (NLST) announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) has affirmed the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) decision upholding the validity of Netlist's U.S. 7,619,912 (‘912) patent. The ruling came after last week's oral hearing before a three-judge panel at the Federal Circuit and pending an appeal granted by the Supreme Court of the U.S., the decision is final and binding on future cases...

"We will now move to lift the stay in the patent infringement lawsuit against Google in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CA., in order to recover current and past damages related to the ‘912 patent"

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/netlist-prevails-against-google-u-110000922.html