Was that supposed to be some kind of revelation? He openly admitted he didn't understand, and you begin by rubbing his nose in it, then repeating nothing new.
Also you're incorrect about this being "all about creating public controversy about the decision, outside the formal appeal process". There are other purposes served by Dr. Bhatt's article.
Bouf, my understanding is that there are people on Singer's team that have relationships/history with the FC. What affect, if any, does this have on the case?