And the right to expect that Covington would have hammered her back to applying her own sense of what is correct and incorrect in reaching her decision. That is the purpose of advocacy, especially highly paid, nationally recognized, specialized expert level of advocacy.
>But Amarin had the right to expect a judge will apply her own sense of what is correct and incorrect in reaching her decision
I don't think Amarin could have reasonably expected Du to pick up the error in Mori. What I think they did expect was that she would be convinced by the argument that Mori was not performed in the correct patient population (i.e. very high triglycerides) and that this population has very unique characteristics w.r.t. LDL changes upon DHA treatment.
Amarin essentially bet the farm on that argument. I find that argument compelling with ample support from the literature, but ultimately it did not persuade Du.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
