Replies to post #79946 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[TonyJoe1957]

Wow!
What a great find!

[Scruffer]

AWESOME, FANTASTIC, MAGNIFICENT, SUPERB, OUTSTANDING.

This is the 1st time Cisco has named ChanBond in any 10Q/K filing.

This is so promising and encouraging. As well as... Foreshadowing?

It's not material for them b/c they have $10B+ in cash.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/858877/000085887720000006/a10qq3fy20.htm#s2BD0F21437CE5B8BB748F49120B3789C

And they give the standard "Deny, Deny, Deny" response:

"We believe that the service provider defendants have strong non-infringement, invalidity and other defenses."

Well, we know this is a bunch of bovine scatology.

Legal has no other disclosure obligation or option (at this time).

No mention of ChanBond ANYWHERE in the 2 previous quarterly filings:
• January 25, 2020
> https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/858877/000085887720000004/a10qq2fy20.htm
• October 26, 2019
> https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/858877/000085887719000018/a10qq1fy20.htm

I'm super-duper stoked.

Tremendous find and post LÜ. :-)

It goes w/o saying, you made my week, Scruff-dilliocious

[Frankp]

Nice Find!

[MjMilo]

This might just be a little different Cisco!..lol

It certainly appears to me that Cisco is laying the groundwork for their shareholders to understand the payout that is coming and the negative impact it may have on shareholder value.

Nobody has revealed how much the indemnification price tag might be.

THis is new territory and so for Cisco to on the one hand make this seem like no big deal...but then on the other hand say they don't have a lot of experience with indemnification is a bit disingenuous.

We can all see the tide has really begun to turn ....

Onward!

[Nestegg McMuffin]

“...but should Chanbond prevail in its cases against the service provider defendants...”

First official filing acknowledgement that Carter and co. could win, I think.

Looking forward to trial.

[VC3]

Hi Long.....wow, what a great find and what a great way to start the day. Thanks!

[stockfan100]

Excellent find long uoip! Looks like one or more settlement(s) FIRWORKS to me!

[magnus_invest]

Awesome find Long

Long UOIP,
~Magnus

[Gonfishun]

Fantastic. Nice work Long!

[jrt03]

Amazing find! Long time holder of UOIP... quietly watching the board and waiting to collect. Go UOIP!

[Targun]

Wowza! 2020 is the year!

[justus1]

Thanks Long! Terrific piece of information for all us LONGS!

[Long term]

Who's the indemnification expert here? Does it work like insurance when a $ # is establish & the indemnifier pays dose the indemnifier have what they have in the insurance industry reinsurance...IE: can the indemnifier ( for protection) take out an insurance policy that would cover amts beyond the amt they said they would indemnify?

[money2013]

Yesssss!!! Thank you for sharing this.

[papa p]

Thanks!! Great find.

[flyingboozeman]

Thanks a lot for sharing this the board! It's a big hint for all of us.

[JamieE]

Saw that LONG !!!!! Totally AWESOME . Excellent DD . Thank You !

[Ranger185]

Great find Long, thanks for taking the time to dig and find that and share it with all of us, great job.

[brokeintx]

Outstanding find!! I wonder what this bit of info would mean to our pps if we were still trading? Thanks Long!!! And thank you to everyone else here as well. I, like the rest of the silent majority here, really do appreciate the efforts being put forth to keep everyone informed and up to date.

[zombywolf]

During the CAFC hearing last year, Chen remarked to Wayne (Cisco Lawyer) during a brief exchange that the other patents didnt have the same problems that '822 had. That was straight from the tech CAFC judge, and Wayne had to hear it and take it back to Cisco.

[tsand]

Thank you Long UOIP! When most on this board are settling in to the pre-trial on July 2, you continue to add more DD! You rock!! Boo-yeah!!

[Scruffer]

I still think Cisco & others will buy patents.

One big question is...

>> How much technical backbone infrastructure revenue does Cisco obtain from all 447 cable companies and their subsidiaries (NBC Universal, etc.)?

https://broadbandnow.com/Cable-Providers

Regardless of the merit of these claims, they can be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of technical and management personnel, or require us to develop a non-infringing technology or enter into license agreements. Where claims are made by customers, resistance even to unmeritorious claims could damage customer relationships. There can be no assurance that licenses will be available on acceptable terms and conditions, if at all, or that our indemnification by our suppliers will be adequate to cover our costs if a claim were brought directly against us or our customers. Furthermore, because of the potential for high court awards that are NOT necessarily predictable, it is NOT UNUSUAL to find even arguably unmeritorious claims settled for significant amounts.