Replies to post #278551 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

The point I was making was the Mori statistical reassessment should have been undertaken by Amarin/ Covington before the trial - instead of Amarin just accepting that everything stated in Mori was gospel it should have been torn apart prior to trial
The further point I was making is that

[alm2]

Sts66- no the point I was making is that Amarin /Covington should have undertaken a statistical reassessment of Mori and indeed other relevant studies - it would have cost peanuts but could have torn the studies (certainly Mori) apart - all this before the trial - so such could have been evidenced in the trial
The further point I was making is that RMitra within a few days after the trial outcome had done just that and it was all e mailed to Amarin/ Covington - yet this is now only revealed in the Bhatt paper some time thereafter and post Singer brief / amicus deadline (moot point as to whether it can be considered by FC-see below)
The problem appears to focus now on how this gets before the FC - new evidence issue - see Marksman comments just posted
No doubt there will be many twists and turns yet to this roller coaster litigation ride
Alm