alm, if I remember in Du's ruling, she mentioned how AMRN's expert testified that the results were not significant, but she ignored his testimony and stated he was wrong and cited Mori. Obviously she was wrong in her conclusion and in ignoring the expert. I really don't think another expert, even a statistician would have changed anything...like a lot of her decision, she cherry picked arguments supporting her view and ignored those that were contrary to it. I now put a reversal or remand at over 95% probability. No way the FC lets this get by them unless they want a SC review.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
