Cognitive Dissonance huh?
You do a fantastic job of pretending you are outside of left and right while spinning out right-wing talking points. This is a thing. It’s fantastic.
You’re really great at this stuff. Good luck with that.
In this instance, you made two random Italian scientists quoted in an obscure Reuter’s report the end all and be all of scientific evidence and used Chompsky to justify it while again suggesting you are consistent with the greatest traditions of science and that Chompsky would give the seal of approval on these very adept mental hijinx and endorse the manufactured consent of the scientific establishment, but careful not to state the argument that way. Very adept!
In the other story, the Chloroquine story, there are multiple studies, all saying the same thing, but I do not disagree that the further investigation of the one study might be worthwhile. It should be certain. If there were any major and truly discrediting issues with the evidence in the study, how it was run or reported, anyone would want to know that, even the scientific establishment. I don’t necessarily believe there is a conspiracy or any attempt to “manufacture consent” at some mysterious Q level. But if there is something to the study having flaws, I’m open minded enough to consider it. I simply want science, not nonsense and conspiracy theories driving the conversations and decisions, at the highest level.
Good luck!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
