Well, to be totally accurate, some of the monkies balls shrunk too. Half kidding but not. Point is, CW's GRAS study didn't show any of this stuff at any dosage level. To what do you attribute the differences between CV's original GRAS study, and CW's GRAS study? Furthermore, what changed in CV's new study that so far makes it sound like it turned out better this time? I haven't read that one yet, but if there are now no problems at the same high dosage levels, then I would want to know how that was achieved: