InvestorsHub Logo

Jetmek_03052

05/18/20 3:06 PM

#204238 RE: boomer0921 #204237

Well, that certainly is one way to look at it. DBMM can’t perform any WORSE than they have been!

Ever since they’ve been following their “business model” (seven YEARS?) after getting Digital Clarity as a subsidiary, they’ve not made a dime!

There’s only one way to go for them. First they have develop a “business model” that actually makes them a profit. Then MAYBE, they wouldn’t have to keep going DEEPER INTO DEBT, just to fund day-to-day operations! As it is right now, Linda and the rest are fighting to stay in business to do one thing - sell shares to unsuspecting “investors”.

If they don’t change that “business model” talked about in ALL their financial Q’s and K’s, there’s only the LOWER step from where they are RIGHT NOW (which is expert market, broke, borrowing simply to keep the lights on, basically struggling to survive).

That step would be REVOCATION and BELLY UP.

otterman

05/18/20 3:13 PM

#204239 RE: boomer0921 #204237

And just how, pray tell, does one hash out a case based on future performance? Please show us how? Or just give us 1 example of a case that was debated on future performance. Take as long as you need. Forever if necessary.

luvthemtrainz

05/19/20 9:28 AM

#204277 RE: boomer0921 #204237

Would that include the host of "Like I said" posts, i.e., 'past performance'?