So now the hope is that a big healthcare/pharma or tech company is going to pour a bunch of money into QMC to back HealthID? Seriously?
No. It's a strawman that doesn't address the question asked at all:
Why any company would go with QMC's HealthID when highly reputable and credible companies like these can build it better-faster-cheaper?
It's even more of a strawman given the first line in the article cited:
Now maybe if the article said UHC was out backing companies that hadn't done anything in the past decade, stopped filing required financials, were getting sued by school districts, forfeited their right to transact business in the state where they operate, etc...