How could he have been clearly accurate in a way that the typical audience of this show could comprehend correctly?
(I do agree his language was sloppy at best, misleading at worst.)
The Top 100 is an awful metric in the first place, imo.
You should only be allowed to quote it, if you give the bottom 100 at the same time. And who is going to do that?
Does that show actually have any impact in terms of getting new investors on board? I doubt it.
It gives us something to debate about, I suppose.
Be interesting what he says if he goes back on the show after topline.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
