InvestorsHub Logo

concapk

05/17/20 11:12 AM

#274236 RE: concapk #274101

Question for lawyers on this board.... someone please comment that has legal expertise...

I have read the opening briefs twice and the following leads to me asking this question:

Through out the brief Singer always refers to "Skilled Artisan "
when talking about Obviousness whether in Primi Facia or Secondary
Considerations. He does not refer to Posa (person of ordinary skill)
until end of brief. There is quite a difference between what a Skilled
Artisan would see/understand than a Person Of Ordinary Skill would
see/understand. Only on page #58 he refers to "Ordinary Artisan" and
page #59 "Ordinary Skill" does he refer to POSA.

Is Singer trying to make his argument more emphatic by making the Appellant Court understand that scientists of skill could not see Obviouness, let alone those of ordinary skill.... or is he required to use Skilled Artisan when referring to scientists working on studies, new drugs ,etc.