InvestorsHub Logo

Eagle1947

05/08/20 10:03 AM

#191285 RE: paythejuice #191283

Yes, and it's killing me ... I guess it was just one more of those "hey, it is just around the corner" misleading notices.

Misleading statements as few as they are seem to be the only thing the company is able to produce.

Still I can't bring myself to dissolve all of my holdings !

What the hell is wrong with me, so many other opportunities out there for this money ...

SC8

05/08/20 10:08 AM

#191286 RE: paythejuice #191283

Why do you say steal when any LQMT ip used elsewhere was bought and paid for?

myryebread

05/08/20 10:31 AM

#191288 RE: paythejuice #191283

I wouldn't say stole they did buy it and just transferred it to
China to be used while LQMT goes back in the shadows.

jrs5

05/08/20 11:58 AM

#191294 RE: paythejuice #191283

If he just wanted the IP, he could have just waited another couple years when LQMT would have gone bankrupt. Why didn't he just do this?

Why did he spend so much legal effort to stop Kang here in the US if he only wanted the IP for China?

Why would Eon have forced him to sign a non compete agreement if they knew it was just an IP grab?

Why would he have cared to cut operating expenses at LQMT if he only wanted the IP?

Why wouldn't he have taken a bloated salary like past CEO's to get some of his money back if he only wanted the IP?

I could go on, but the list of reasons is endless. He clearly intends to make LQMT successful. Whether or not he succeeds, time will tell.