InvestorsHub Logo

xstocks

05/04/20 11:49 AM

#191045 RE: handsomehank #191043

FYI - This is something my company defended in an exact situation involving Trademark infringement where there was an attempt to con the Trademark by adding a dash between two extremely popular and widely used words and after several years of the legal process we won by Jury decision. So it seems there would be no reason this cannot be put to rest.... especially since the two words involving my Trademark litigation were used on a much larger scale as a two word combination than liquid metal which is just sort of starting to spread its wings comparatively speaking.

jrs5

05/04/20 1:46 PM

#191048 RE: handsomehank #191043

The article uses both terms, "liquid-metal" and "liquid metal ". Perhaps the author didn't know what he was writing. Also, this term is not being used to describe an amorphous alloy or metallic glass. I believe the company has gone after other companies that used either of these terms to describe their amorphous metals. But I am not aware of them going after any company for using this term for simple melted metals or even metals that are liquid at room temperature (gallium, etc. ).
We here the term liquid metal paste used as a thermal barrier on CE components, which has been around for many years. So if it is not an amorphous alloy, not sure much can be done.