InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BBANBOB

04/29/20 9:54 AM

#623315 RE: Donotunderstand #623312

DONOT

Let's just say I KNOW FOR FACT what they have said in the PASTTTTTT, and I seriously doubt this has changed, EVEN YEARS LATER.

SO YOU reach out and see if IF IF their opinions have changed years later, THEY WERE NOT HIRED BY SHAREHOLDERS, THEY WERE HIRED BY and WORKED FOR their clients, "THE EQUITY COMM" and are ethically encumbered of speaking about a clients case.

Or here is one better! IF IF IF you have a working relationship with an attorney, call them up and say HEY if I call an attorney that was hired by someone other than myself to represent this other client that had NO RELATIONSHIP to me what so ever, Can this attorney SPEAK TO ME about his clients case in any form or fashion!!!!!


This is honestly beyond belief that anyone actually thinks this would be allowed or ethical, again I would suggest it might very well be grounds to be brought in front of the BARR in TEXAS at lest for reprimanding in not DIS-DEBARMENT..

I know for darn sure NONE of MY ATTORNEYS would ever do such a thing and especially to me!!!!!!!!!!!
icon url

hotmeat

04/29/20 11:36 AM

#623340 RE: Donotunderstand #623312

I had contacted Justin in early 2019 asking him if he could resolve for the board whether there were indeed assets or not and he basically gave a "nothing" answer in that he had no clue or just did not want any info he gave documented via email. Got ZERO impression, not even a hint that he knew whether there was anything left.