InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CherryTree1

04/25/20 8:21 PM

#280054 RE: JerryCampbell #280053

It is water under the bridge at this point.
We'll just have to see what happens over then next few months.
icon url

Doc logic

04/25/20 11:11 PM

#280066 RE: JerryCampbell #280053

JerryCampbell,

Seems like FDA guidance has been changing enough with the science over the last 5 years for that round hole to be squared out a bit especially in light of the missing SOC/placebo patients that FDA didn't want to enroll after all planned for treatment patients did. Just sayin : ). Best wishes.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

04/26/20 11:38 AM

#280106 RE: JerryCampbell #280053

The company would still have had to pay for continuing the treatments in this trial (and let’s not forget the 90 or so patients in the expanded access trial) as they would never have stopped treating them, and then would have had to pay for treating all those 400 new patients (and the additional patients who didn’t qualify but whose treatments were also made). They’d already struggled to fund the current trial for 7 years by 2015. Raising the funds for an additional trial to run for another four or five years would have been even more difficult, especially if they’d given up on the current one. They’d have had to take on a partner, I’d think for certain, and I don’t think that was a pathway LP was interested in walking at the time.
icon url

TopelRoad

04/27/20 1:30 AM

#280158 RE: JerryCampbell #280053

One of the agonies of clinical trial design is that the wrong end point can be selected or the trial design can be faulty. NWBO is not the only company that has encountered these issues.

The most conservative approach is always best, it builds trust and keeps patients safe. Integrity matters in this business.