Replies to post #605561 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Louie_Louie]

Yes, me also. Some of the points in that doc are valid.

[YanksGhost]

<< Carlos has a valid point.>> WTF?

If so, Judge Margaret Sweeney will accept and docket the Amicus Curiae brief immediately. I think this is about as likely as Stormy Daniels being hired to replace the recently instated White House Press Secretary and doing the next briefing in the nude and on a pole.

The initial premise is off-the-rails crazy because the GSEs have NEVER been declared "critically undercapitalized." This derives from capital standards being suspended during conservatorship under the terms of the SPSPA. The rest of the "brief" wobbles somewhere between jibberish and hydrophobic foaming of the mouth.

The suits pending before the Court of Claims have nothing to do with the asinine claims advanced in this brief. Crazy Carlos seeks to discredit and impune nearly the full scope of Plaintiffs with standing in the Judge's court. This can only serve to favorably influence the government's dismissal request that remains pending. Anyone see any shareholder value in yet another dismissal from the judiciary?

[mrfence]

The secret plan's Governments only "out"...

The only way to make legal the Government's actions to some extent, is considering the 10% and NWS dividend as schemes of faster repayment of the SPS and recapitalization, according to the exceptions to the Restriction On Capital Distributions, because there's no fastest gear than a NWS dividend

...to avoid damages in excess of injuries and the simpelist remedy for the court to award as it resolves or voids all lawsuits.

That's the #1 objective of the court at it's core :-)

[mrfence]

Carlo's makes another solid point here ... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=155158404