That’s a very broad inaccurate picture you just painted. But in the case of Li, that is a very accurate picture of how business decisions are made. Li is at the bottom rung of that painting of how business is conducted. Unlike a Ma Yun, A.K.A Jack Ma who has direct influence to a hire level in the Chinese NPC.
In essence Li owns dukus, bubkis, zilch, nada. On paper Li, owns shares. China owns Li. By proxy of Li, China owns LQMT HK. Li works for the benefit of his party. Over here people work for the benefit of themselves. In this post I’m simplifying achievement.
Due to certain international laws governing the ownership of U.S. Companies. Another government cannot directly invest/control a U.S. company. So, it is done via proxies. In the case of LQMT at this point in time it makes zero sense to own or invest in a non profitable entity. Unless the investor or buyer sees a way to profit. In the case of Li, the use of LQMT’s IP has had positive results in China. The money spent on the IP of LQMT is having a positive return in China by reasons of their unverifiable sales and income. The U.S. shares involved at this point are of no consequence to Li/China as they have not altered the marketing and sales strategy of LQMT USA, and in fact shutdown for now all direct U.S. manufacturing. Also, LQMT USA cash received from China, via Eontec, via Li, in LQMT USA is also being shifted/transfered back to yihao metals, back to Eontec, back to Li, back to China, via the restructuring of manufacturing costs for LQMT USA parts made in China.
Sometimes people have to put down the cup of coffee and smell the tea leaves. Just follow the money.
Now that being said. Li may have solved the Chinese puzzle of what to do with amorphous metal in China. But the team or whatever you want to call them here in the USA have not.
Good luck to you
.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
