InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BayouBengals

12/13/06 1:55 AM

#14460 RE: goosemeister #14459

They're concerned about our financial well being...
without knowing if we've been naughty or nice...
Ya think we'll be getting Christmas presents also?
icon url

anderbest18

12/13/06 2:53 AM

#14467 RE: goosemeister #14459

LOL... probably. Altruists with a stake in the stock market, hec, the pink sheets! They better become priests, at least that would be more honourable than what they are doing now.
icon url

TruthChecker

12/13/06 3:33 AM

#14469 RE: goosemeister #14459

This is a typical response from a Pumper of a stock.

Anyone who posts anything "Alternative" to the "going"
scheme, is labeled as a "basher" or "Ultruistic".

Why is it that when people bring up legitimate concerns,
they are labeled as the enemy, or are ridiculed ?

As was the FACT about my post on 11/27, concerning the
dividend scam and the idea that it was a re-direction
of peoples' attention away from USSE stock, I say now
that the accusers of myself and other concerned posters
is no more than another re-direction effort.

When I said, on 11/27, to be careful about USSE stock,
and the dividend sham, the stock was at $ .41. It is now
below $ .26, just a few weeks later. THIS MESSAGE WAS
ORIGINALLY CENSORED by the powers on this board who did
not want this board to read that message.

Well, who was right ?

You can thank the moderators on this board for your
40 % losses since then. Oh, and of course, they continue
to tell you that "don't worry, there must be a reason
for the stock going down, and it will bounce back...
DON'T sell...it's only a loss if you sell."

What do you think of a company that first promises that
their reactors are being built, as we speak. Then, later,
says, well, we are still buying the parts ? What do you
think of a company that promises a dividend on a stock,
in order to get you to hang on to your stock, only to miss
the dividend deadline ? What do you think of a company
that issues a PR implying that they have bought a factory
complex for $ 9 Million, when in fact, the property is
sitting with a $ 600,000 tax basis, and was bought thru
a third-party ?

And, you don't even want me to get started on Redwood. Go
take a couple of hours and do your DD on Redwood. It's a
real eye-opener. Of the 7-10 stocks they have been involved
with, all of them popped, then crashed. Redwood took their
money off the table, then stopped supporting the stocks.


Doesn't exactly instill confidence, does it ?