InvestorsHub Logo

eightisenough

04/16/20 9:01 AM

#266632 RE: amarininvestor #266630

amar-incorrect. uspto found prima facie obviousness, means Mori was good/ strong showing for them--yet uspto has no work around sec. cons., and after analyzing sec. cons. they went in AMRN"S favor (probably close call for them)--Du did not make mistake interpreting that uspto viewed AMRN as prima facie of obviousness-rather perhaps made errors in sec. cons. factors.

but APP. CT. MUST follow case law and can work around the sec. cons. with ZUP