InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Gigwoof

12/12/06 8:40 PM

#214368 RE: nickulliana #214362

And he didn't because.....
icon url

boogaloo

12/12/06 8:41 PM

#214370 RE: nickulliana #214362

I thought he said if he'd posted them on the 15th then he'd have gone to jail because they were incorrect? Which is it, jail or $1?
icon url

S.A.G.

12/12/06 8:56 PM

#214383 RE: nickulliana #214362

He did say that. I heard it too.
icon url

Saviman

12/12/06 9:05 PM

#214399 RE: nickulliana #214362

And what the heck was wrong with that? Unless this stock was used as money laundry schem by ??? (your guess) and they were forced to hold it until they covered or cement shoes....LOL who knows? Really ROTFLOL....
icon url

ChrisJP

12/12/06 9:23 PM

#214429 RE: nickulliana #214362

Was that $1 Canadian or $1 US.

Cuz .... you know .... you could almost believe $1 Canadian .... lol.

Maybe if they ask him again tomorrow it'll be $10. Think how much richer you all could have been on the 15th if he says that.

Chris

icon url

joelotto

12/12/06 9:34 PM

#214443 RE: nickulliana #214362

I think Petar is talking out of his a$$. How can he say it would have gone to $1 if the AFs were out on Nov 15th.......but at the same time tell you guys that they sold 110mil shares for 11mil dollars. Why not put the AFs out first and then sell them if they need to but with much less dilution. think about it....they told us Wessal was buying 20% of the OS and they got 25mil dollars that will prevent selling shares, and the NASDAQ is in sight, and the AFs are coming,......but non of it happened and they sold over 100mil shares.
icon url

tombrady12nh

12/12/06 10:10 PM

#214495 RE: nickulliana #214362

nickulliana-Petar didn't even have the audit to post on the 15th, go to a dollar! let's get back to .25 now. Petar cost me some big money for pulling a no show on the 15th. JMHO
icon url

4gemz

12/13/06 12:58 AM

#214650 RE: nickulliana #214362

And the problem with that is???????????????????

4gemz
icon url

Tuslog28

12/13/06 9:32 AM

#214831 RE: nickulliana #214362

maybe they felt @ .10/share they had one shot at selling 110 million shares for $10mil to pay for DeVries proported Texas tax bill.

also, if SLJB et. al. was moved to Canada to be held in a trust maybe that was to protect those assets from the same proported Texas tax bill.

they could, if true, be pointing to the direction of corporate ownership. all guesses.