InvestorsHub Logo

goodietime

04/10/20 3:12 PM

#621410 RE: austin01 #621394

imo, He was trying to show that there was substantial value, and shareholders had a right to SURVIVE, and benefit from this value.

That's the way I see it.

Tradeinman

04/10/20 5:17 PM

#621418 RE: austin01 #621394

Justin Nelson(atty with Susman Godfrey),
Had a PowerPoint presentation in court.
I have a screen shot of it, but can’t find it right now, that showed $32B in assets, less $8B in debt, equals $24B.
He mentioned it 3 times and pissed off Walrath.
I believe(and anyone that remembers, please jump in), this was also the time that when asked about the assets, Walrath stated, “they will still be there”.