InvestorsHub Logo

frrol

04/10/20 11:43 AM

#245749 RE: vg_future #245745

There's no secret nor secret recipe. It's not a secret magic potion. The question around dosing is due the combination of change between trials, change within trials, known DLE's, opacity, and implications. The opacity continues, and we'll just have to wait for trial results and future medical presentations. Not uncommon in biotech.

WolfofMia

04/10/20 12:31 PM

#245752 RE: vg_future #245745

This obsession with dosage has to stop until the results are published.



Good luck with that, it is one of the must prominent unknowns.

Hence used for some FUDsting.

Investor2014

04/10/20 1:40 PM

#245766 RE: vg_future #245745

If anything is clear from the A2-73 data it is that high concentration is the absolute most important factor for positive response.

Dose and concentration is inextricably linked and undeniably stated by Anavex.

Understanding and questioning those relationships in the light of the low doses apparently administered in current controlled trials seems important to the Anavex investment thesis.

TempePhil

04/10/20 1:50 PM

#245767 RE: vg_future #245745

Dr.M is using High and Low doses as "place holders". They are trade secrets, hidden for the interests of the company AND shareholders.
True for both Alz trial and PDD trial.
Or to quote Dr.M,
"...Don't specify the dose because we want to maintain complete blinding."

Also, as patients come off trial, dosages can be completely different levels, as has been discussed here.

TempePhil

04/10/20 1:50 PM

#245768 RE: vg_future #245745

Dr.M is using High and Low doses as "place holders". They are trade secrets, hidden for the interests of the company AND shareholders.
True for both Alz trial and PDD trial.
Or to quote Dr.M,
"...Don't specify the dose because we want to maintain complete blinding."

Also, as patients come off trial, dosages can be completely different levels, as has been discussed here.