InvestorsHub Logo

HDGabor

04/04/20 7:42 PM

#262158 RE: CaptBeer #262150

C-

do you weight all secondary considerations to determine if The secondary considerations are a Graham Factor? Or does it take only one positive secondary to be included as the 4th Graham Factor?

Good point. My current understanding:
- not all of the SC have to be exist
- lack of an existence is not negative … does not prove obviousness

(The question: the existing SCs are enough to overweight the other 3 - Graham - factor …?)

Best,
G

anfla

04/04/20 8:38 PM

#262206 RE: CaptBeer #262150

According to the law, no. You don’t get harmed but arguing SCs that the judge doesn’t buy into. Hence the procedural error