InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

GoodGuyBill

04/01/20 8:17 PM

#274695 RE: ahp123 #274636

ahp123, so you agree that it could happen and that you can see where LP wouldn't to let it be known that Duffy was performing dd for merck (assuming that was the case), though you disagree that Duffy was at NWBO for the purpose of DD.

I don't think LP would be lying at all, based on your quote. WHAT SPECIFICALLY DID SHE LIE ABOUT?

Linda Powers, CEO of NW Bio, noted that “Dr. Duffy’s experience with immune therapies for cancer and one of the most successful product development programs in the field will be an invaluable addition to our team. We at NW Bio could not be more excited about Dr. Duffy’s choice to join us and help realize the broad potential of DCVax.””
Now people are saying his was here just to do DD for Merck... so Linda was lying in the PR or people are wrong about him just doing DD.. plane and simple.. you cant have it both ways



She noted his experience-- true.

She said NWBO was excited Duffy had joined them-- true.

She said Duffy would help them realize the broad potential of DCVax-- True.

Assuming Duffy was at NWBO to perform DD for Merck, how does that make any of her statements in you quote untrue or a lie?

If what I am assuming is true, LP had it both ways...lol.

Anyways, AHP123, I know you disagree and I could well be wrong while feeling I am right. So I'll wait and see and hope you and all longs as well as patients benefit tremendously from NWBO whatever the role Duffy/Merck has to play (if one at all).

ok lets say that Duffy being on NWBO's payroll just to do DD. thats fine, could have happend. And i also give you it wouldnt be smart to tell people that.. but the statment in the PR are not downplaying anything.. it is plane lying... i know people here cant see it or wont but it is lying if he was just at nwbo to do DD..-- Furthermore, I would not say that LP was lying as Duffy was working on NWBO's payroll for almost a year, right? She just didn't tell the full story-- that it was temporary for the purpose of dd for Merck. Though you may disagree with me, surely you can see why LP would keep this on the down-low?

icon url

Umibe5690

04/01/20 11:10 PM

#274738 RE: ahp123 #274636

I have discussed this before and while it is possible, I just don't buy Dr Duffy being seconded to NWBO as an employee by Merck to validate their platform.

Usually, someone leaves a large and comfortable company, as I did, and joins a small start-up because it is exciting, great product(s) and for the chance to become very wealthy if it all pans out. Especially the latter. I have no idea if Duffy had golden handcuffs. If he did not, he was crazy to accept a position with NWBO and leave Merck. I had a start-up opportunity and got beaucoup stock options. Did a lot of DD and things worked out as expected. Duffy had to have done the same. To go to NWBO, trust me, he had to have golden handcuff incentives to leave Merck. By going back to Merck, he left a lot of potential money on the table if NWBO is as potentially successful as we longs think. Certainly, Dr. Duffy thought the same when he joined NWBO.

Something changed during the 6 months he was employed by NWBO. This was his chance to hit the big time. What happened? What did he find that caused him to return to Merck? Was there something wrong with the trial that he discovered? Were there indications that the TLD results would likely be just mediocre?

I have heard indirect references that LP is tough to deal with and things are pretty much her way or the highway. Maybe that was not a good fit for Duffy. But if the results were likely stellar and represented a new and exciting paradigm, management fit or lack thereof could be tolerated and compromises made, if the goods could be delivered certainly within a year or two. If Duffy made valuable contributions to the SAP, he had to have come across inside company informational/his own further due diligence and analysis of data he surely was exposed to in order to make valuable contributions in writing the SAP. Maybe in the course of developing this SAP, he became disappointed and concluded that this was not quite the opportunity he had originally thought. Thus, the "golden" handcuffs, at least to him, became "aluminum" and the deal to return back to Merck therefore more enticing.

Dr. Duffy was no longer drinking the cool aid and decided that it was better for his career and pocket-book to accept an offer from Merck that he could not refuse in light of what he had found unsettling at NWBO.

LG has said that nothing has changed and that they are going forward. Dr. Duffy is a good guy but he got an offer from Merck that he could not refuse. " We did not stand in his way because we do not believe employees should be enslaved" to quote LG. Simple as that. Do you believe it? Do you believe that Dr. Duffy and Merck with perhaps NWBO' s assent and participation engaged in an elaborate "employee" ruse to validate a platform so that Merck could go on with a partnership or even buyout and Dr. Duffy returned to Merck with mission accomplished? Possible but I find it hard to believe. It is easier to believe that Dr. Duffy became disillusioned, enough so, to return to Merck. If he did have golden handcuffs to start with, after 6 months he may have seen them becoming green but not as in money.

Some have said that if DI/Duffy were to leave, there would be great concern. Well, the much more important of the two has left under mysterious circumstances. Concerned? You bet I am and I, for one, do not believe the company line on this. JMHO

A concerned investor
,