Replies to post #101026 on BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[Real McCoy]

So they are to be believed when they allegedly told GFive the offer involved the shares, but when they subsequently and repeatedly and then annoyingly stated the bids did not, closed the highest deal for the assets, documented it, and then left, they are not to be believed?

How does one know when to believe them?

[trader59]

There is not one single document anywhere other than that BS presentation that says that NAXOS "owned" BioAmber and "sold" it. Not a single one other than some presentation from a completely unrelated company.

On the other hand, there's a chronicle of the transactions that really occurred during the CCAA and bankruptcy, as well as supporting information in the monitor's reports. But, sure, let's ignore the court proceedings and judges' actual orders, the presentation material trumps a judge any day, right?

Bizarre.