InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lbird33

03/15/20 3:08 PM

#90390 RE: NewMoney #90389

I guess no comment on the IPR sweep the judge brought up?
icon url

DeerBalls

03/15/20 3:40 PM

#90392 RE: NewMoney #90389

$.0205 Last I heard, a decade is 10 years! The first patent VPLM was granted and issued in 2014, if I'm not mistaken!!!! All others, 23/4 patents, were issued in 2015 and after! E.U. patents, about one year ago! Very tough to fairly evaluate VPLM with that misunderstanding, it would seem!

Yes, just under 2Billion shares! And? To some extent, THAT ACCOUNTS FOR A $.02 VS. $6 PER SHARE PRICE! I really doubt that anyone putting any real money into VPLM is aware of shares outstanding. Oh, it has been bought up tons of times before!

Once again, the anti-VPLM arguments lack substance, or are blatantly false: SIX YEARS DOES NOT MAKE A DECADE!


NewMoney  Sunday, 03/15/20 03:00:05 PMRe: nyt post# 903860Post #  of90390 

Something else that cannot be ignored or forgotten is VHC has about 69.5 million shares. VPLM has about 2 Billion shares. Anyone that thinks this is not an important detail does not understand stocks very well. 

Also these patent plays can languish for decades upon decades and go nowhere, as this one has done already. Add the frighteningly dismal court performance of the latest bestest lawyer ever and what you get is a huge red flag that says that almost anything else would be a smarter place to invest.