Replies to post #77969 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[VC3]

Many thanks.

[Goodbuddy4863]

March 6th Letter to the Honorable Judge Richard G. has been submitted.

Now updated in the Pacer Reports.


The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
The United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801


Thank You very much!

[Goodbuddy4863]

Any chance this can be made a Sticky?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154214630

[long uoip]

hot button at trial will definitely be ~ "willfulness allegation" the 2 varying perspectives/allegations, this issue is the epicenter of this case,
billy's team best address, articulate & genuinely appeal to the jury

re: letter ~ "2nd trial, if needed, should be scheduled with sufficient time after the 1st trial to provide the parties an opportunity to discuss potential resolution,
including, if appropriate, by participating in a formal mediation process"

looks like both sides are open to mediation & potential resolution after 1st,
we gotta KICK BUTT in court 1st kick at the can (given uoip shareholders viewpoints at trial we have A GOOD SHOT AT KNOCKOUT 1st ROUND)
then, I think it's GAME OVER for the 13 & even the defense litigators know it

I believe carter's A-team's LOCKED & LOADED for battle
(the tech & values have already been PROVEN in a court of law)

[long uoip]

(493) Main Doc­ument, Letter Mar 9, 2020

I intuit Stephen B. Brauerman responded to Jennifer Ying's letter re:
1. Defendants’ Position on Mediation After the 1st Trial
2. Comcast Is Not an Appropriate 2nd Defendant for Trial
3. Consolidation of the Charter Defendants is Legally Impermissible