That’s quite a speech about the importance you place on venue. Well articulated. I don’t think it matters. LP has given green eggs and ham at international venues and webcasts. In a box, with a fox, in a boat, with a goat.
Have you considered the simple possibility that the reason for the PR verbage is because they are drumming up support for a get out the vote campaign?
They don't need votes for a quorum as long as they issue the proxy 21+ days in advance and have the accountant approval as a question. They don't need votes to re-elect the directors as they only need a single vote. So why?
Despite what some say, any buyout at more than a small amount over market will carry easy.
So what do they need votes for? We will likely find out about March 27.
Umibe5690, Exactly....they really need not have inserted “interesting” into the PR. It only opens them up to more criticism if it emerges to be “not as advertised”. There are some here who are trying to obfuscate the nuance of the PR and what it is conveying. I don’t have any doubt that as Harvard trained lawyers, LP & LG would NOT be careless in drafting the PR. All will be revealed in their Notice of ASM before the end of March....
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
