Replies to post #2510 on Innovative Designs Inc (IVDN)

[weberse]

Everything you mentioned is true, at a high level for a typical company in a normal environment. Not for these guys, they had good traction for sales before these corrupt FTC geniuses tried to squash them. The product was at Home Depot, which produced their own video about it's merits. I believe GD has more info on the potential sale they were going to lock with a national home builder or seller but due to the case that was cancelled - no one will touch this while a government supported case is going on. So to your point about not having sales, that will or at least should change when this case is officially dismissed by the courts and IVDN claims the win. It will take time for all of this to unfold, and sales to ramp up - the CEO kept IVDN afloat through all this last few years so I don't expect shareholders to try and push him out, in fact he will probably get more support now. I'm one of the shareholders for a lot of years, like GD, and I know many more that hold a good chunk of IVDN shares. I'm happy with the report the judge submitted and but I also understand that this was just step 1, it will take time to re-build what they have lost. I would like to see some of those international consultants that signed agreements with IVDN before or while the case was ongoing to now step up and find some international sales to start us off. Hopefully we hear something soon from the CEO, but I wouldn't anticipate anything until the case is officially over.

[pitcook]

NT so you say that a company is worthless until they make a profit. That alone shows you must have some agenda trying to keep the Share Price low.

I won't waste time of readers here by listing 100's of public stocks worth billions of dollars that have not turned a profit.

Here is my understanding; we have a PROVEN product that has a rating of R6.
The competition by Corning and DuPont has Zero R insulation rating.

The world is now looking to go green when possible. If the above is true, every builder has the option of telling new buyers that they are building the most environmentally friendly product, that will save home/office/University/Government buildings owners a ton of money on their heating and cooling bills. If I am a developer and know about this, why would I let them put in garbage vs. IVDN's?

They have not made a profit for some bogus reason, oh yeah they were sued in court with a false claim (probably induced by the competition) that their insulation didn't work. They had contracts with National big box retailers and supposedly major home builders (Ryan Homes?) that stopped for obvious reasons.

Credit to Joe for keeping the lights on through this attemp to put him out of business. So in a little bit of time if the case is completely thrown out the cash will roll in. If I was Corning or DuPont etc. I would try to buy them out or merge, so they could claim to have the best product BY FAR in the world.

If we only get 10% of this business it would mean many dollars to up the SP.

And by the way, if you are an outdoors clothing maker (Billions in sales per year) and can make your clothing many times warmer, how could you not buy and advertise it to consumers, especially if your competition does.

I think the biggest problem IVDN will have is not having a large enough sales team to promote and sell it. Right now nowbody knows about us, if Joe starts to promote and present at trade shows which will take a little time---look out.

Unless the Judge changes course, and I don't like people to hype stock, because mostly it's without merit, this should be a no-brainer to buy at just a few pennies per share. I have other stocks with supposed disruptive technology that once proven to work will make me rich. This is already proven! The gate that blocked our Secretariat is now running and we have the triple crown winning insulation.

Thanks to GD for all factual information.