crtg I am I am. First we have to see the Patent, or at least progress on the Patent? Even if a Supplier accepts payment, it won't mean they can go forward without a working chemical to replace the original CHS?
It is not 15 cents a share, but just above 11 cents a share! Like a few others, we all hope you are right, but want to see the proper approach to commercializing, which you or KRAFTY will ever explain properly!
No more listening to management people, they seem not to know which shoe goes on which foot? But, to some Loyalists, anything management says is what the facts are? Nonsense! When they make sense, then I will listen, but I will not listen to "PUMPERS," who for whatever reason, believe in whatever the CEO says!
This was my favorite stck back when, but when I saw the inefficient way they conducted business with the potential partners, and with NDSU as well, I lost faith sorry to say!
Just an example? They never talked about testing when they were dealing with the Potential partners! Why? Simply because they didn't have enough money to buy a new pair of shoelaces if one of them broke! They depended on the Partners to do all the testing IMO, and that didn't make any sense at all! Then this internal "Loaner?" Why wasn't money forwarded when CRTG had the best chance to make a success of things? It seems that the Testing costs were inhibiting the relationships, though I may be wrong on all counts? Testing in Vehicles is a very expensive proposition, and why should the Vehicle manufacturer spend anything when their working models seemed to be efficient enough at the time? To gamble on a new system is too expensive to even consider as possible!! IMO...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
