InvestorsHub Logo

biosectinvestor

01/31/20 10:04 PM

#262691 RE: Umibe5690 #262690

Though I consider secondhand descriptions of calls as less compelling evidence generally for my due diligence, I agree with you about how why you said has been twisted far beyond anything reasonable for one poster to make his claims about the company.

GLTU Umibe!

flipper44

01/31/20 10:38 PM

#262697 RE: Umibe5690 #262690

Les made the rounds. BWIS, Umbibe, who else, I’ll have to look. Hankman was so concerned he had to get a written response from David Saying they weren’t waiting for the guidelines. Unlike most longs here, I kept reminding people of Dave’s email.

HappyLibrarian

02/01/20 8:05 AM

#262720 RE: Umibe5690 #262690

We give little credence to the phone exchanges because the sorry history of these phone exchanges, especially with Les Goldman have proven that do not provide any useful or accurate information as to when things will happen and what will happen with the DCVax-L Phase 3 Trial.

We also heavily discount them because Mr. Goldman appears to have a habit of convincing shareholders that things are more positive and imminent than several later years of bad events later prove that they are.