InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bouf

01/15/20 8:44 PM

#241466 RE: Whalatane #241460

KIWI—

Exactly, the argument does not make common sense.

A
icon url

VuBru

01/16/20 10:11 AM

#241603 RE: Whalatane #241460

Kiwi - As per my previous post, the old label for V explicitly states multiple times that there is no evidence that V influences risk for pancreatitis. Why on earth would a doctor prescribe V for <12 weeks for a disorder that the label says it should not be used to treat?
icon url

BioChica

01/16/20 10:16 AM

#241605 RE: Whalatane #241460

Can't imagine a doctor following this routine. Total nonsense posed by the defendants.
icon url

MateoPaisa

01/16/20 10:40 AM

#241608 RE: Whalatane #241460

Kiwi,

As we previously discussed, I still see this case as little more than noise. In spite of the massive attention it has on this board, I am still basically ignoring it, save for a few basic posts, and fully expect it to blow over and go away (and expect even more cases to pass us by.

Interesting how this is moving along