Litigation experts are always subject to some question as to bias because they get paid by the party that hires them to testify about their opinions. Past payments for speaking etc. are one thing, and will be used to try to undermine him, but this is not that strong a point because he obviously does a lot of paid speaking for numerous players in the biz. He can get paid for his time testifying, but he can’t have a financial interest that would become more valuable if he testifies one way v. another. That would kill his credibility. I have to believe Covington has this covered, but the trial lawyer in me can’t help but worry about this kind of thing, as that’s what we do.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
