InvestorsHub Logo

bcde

12/29/19 12:01 AM

#584668 RE: Donotunderstand #584645

"I believe that the current case in front of Lamberth is a transfer of a Fairholme case from another judge

There was a different original case - I believe the first to some judgement - in which Lamberth granted GOV motion to dismiss - said 4617 precluded intervention - said some not ripe anyway - and told us to go to Congress to change the law as courts could not help

I do not remember that plaintiff but assume that one is dead"

Remanded Perry case in Judge Lambert's court is based on direct claims related to damages. So everything matters and all the facts do matters.