InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 4110
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2017

Re: Donotunderstand post# 584645

Sunday, 12/29/2019 12:01:42 AM

Sunday, December 29, 2019 12:01:42 AM

Post# of 795828
"I believe that the current case in front of Lamberth is a transfer of a Fairholme case from another judge

There was a different original case - I believe the first to some judgement - in which Lamberth granted GOV motion to dismiss - said 4617 precluded intervention - said some not ripe anyway - and told us to go to Congress to change the law as courts could not help

I do not remember that plaintiff but assume that one is dead"

Remanded Perry case in Judge Lambert's court is based on direct claims related to damages. So everything matters and all the facts do matters.