If you're speaking of $2 to $5 billion in a buyout, I believe it would be a bargain unless further testing proves that DCVax-L and Direct only work in GBM, and they still have a long way to go before approval.
I wish I were more technically knowledgeable about what we hold, but I'm not, but best I can tell, our vaccines have been tried, and anecdotally succeeded in cancers beyond GBM. Certainly it may not work in every cancer, but what if instead of just GBM it also works in one other, or two others, or three others. The point is, we don't know, but would you sell off the company without having any indication of what the vaccine may do beyond GBM.
I'd like to see a partnership, and I believe such a partnership could bring in hundreds of millions if they don't take an equity position, perhaps a billion or more if they do. Without taking an equity position in the company, they might have say a 35% interest in DCVax-L alone. In some cases I've seen a company partner where they took say a 30% interest in a specific drug, as well as a 30% interest in the company. If a billion dollars was earned from sales of the drug, 30% would go directly to them as they own 30% of it, in addition their net worth would reflect what happened to the stock with $700 million in earnings. In some cases I believe that such a partnership can actually be more lucrative than acquiring the company because the increase in share price of the independent biotech may very well be greater than all the earnings from product sales. I should note that if you do own 30% of a company you essentially have control of it as it's almost impossible to defeat you in a voting situation.
Gary