Replies to post #75464 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[BrokeAgent]

I thought he already ruled on that. I wonder why he didn't include the order with the summary?

On another note, some interesting news in Reuters today regarding legislation on injunctions that could impact this case.

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1YO057?__twitter_impression=true

[Goodbuddy4863]

CONCLUSION:

"For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinions of Cathleen Thomas Quigley Regarding Written Description and Enablement, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (D.I. 367) is granted-in-part and denied-in-part.<<<<<<<Weird?

A separate order will issue"

[Goodbuddy4863]

So ordered and so entered in the Update Pacer Reports just now.

Thank You Dilly!