Replies to post #24652 on Pacific Ventures Group Inc (PACV)

[Chivito]

Looking like a minimum of 1:100 possibly 1:250 max

[tutankhamuns]

Wow. That’s such an insult to longs... Smh

No, a reverse split is necessary to achieve PACV goals of attracting higher quality investors

They could’ve at least said institutional. Lol

$PACV

[Alexxdj1]

That’s funny because these otc think just because it’s trading 1$ by rs that they will attract institutional which is the absolute opposite. You attracted yourself to professional research organizations that will see through the otc and pumped and short tf out of a stock ie citron last year with India global. So if they think an uplist will attract more liquidity i need to find the dispensary with the good drugs Sharon and co is going to. Lol

[tedgoeseast]

what is a higher quality investor

[Jluuu]

THANK YOU

[balamidas]

For uplist it's very healthy but we have to wait for PR to see their game plan about uplist.

[TJG]

You will excuse me if I dont buy that, but what you just received from a qualified Investor Relations person was material information that has not been given to the public yet...that is a direct violation of SEC regulations.... the only thing that has been made public by the company is that an RS has been approved.. they also state in the 8-K and the 14c that they have the right and ability to cancel or let the RS expire. So for you to get an email that give a definitive answer that the RS will happen is you getting privileged information that the rest of the market has not...

So I dont think, IMO, he ever said that.

[Squirrely_McShitty]

What a farce! This is so bad it is funny!

1) The English is pretty poor for an IR rep,

2) IR would either release this information in a PR for 8-k or not release it at all. They are not going to provide insider information to some any-random-Dick-on-the-street single individual. That would be illegal!,

3) IR would not tell a "low quality" investor that they are not the kind of investor the company is looking for. "Ya, we want to R/S so we can get a better quality of investor than people like you, Mr. Adam 16...If that is your REAL name",

4) The only e-mail responses ever to even consider believing are ones that are posted in a screen shot...not something that is typed into an ihub message without proof the question/response were even sent/received.

If this is the level of what passes for "authentic", well, I received an email from IR this morning as well...It reads as follows:

Dear Buttercup972,

Thanks for contacting us!

Alright, here is the real deal, dude. There is no way in hell $PACV is going to pull the trigger on a reverse split!!! We just vote through this same crap every year to cover our ass-etts (get it...ass and assets. It's a play on words). You can be rest assured you investment is safe.

In fact, if you give me your address, we will mail you a certificate for a free 10,000 shares just for trying our new "meat wrapped 'meat-in-meat' meat flavored snack" in pork, beef, chicken, tuna, salmon, shrimp, cheddar, head cheese, San Francisco Bay (spicy!), and Vegetarian flavors. Also try our two new flavors of "meat wrapped 'meat-in-meat' meat flavored snack" - Liver and Onions & Buttered Popcorn!

Thanks so much for being one of our less-desired-but-somewhat-vaguely-important clients. Please ask any REAL traders you know (NASDAQ, NYSE, or S&P only!) to ask their provider if they carry our stock. If they don't, tell them to demand they do!

Sincerely,

Lawrence 'The Hammer" Finklestein

Investor Relations
McShitty, McNutt, McNatty, McRawnsuch, and Finklestein
Investor Relations R' Us

Ask about our "Pig in a Poke" family discount program!