Replies to post #82199 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[BigE1960]

Again, we are talking about something that others are pursuing, i.e., blockchain plus a tag. This concept has been proposed and is being explored and beta tested by major global companies. The only difference here is that QMC is pitching a QD based tag, although again, they are neither alone nor first with this concept.

The tag environment, form, and requirements are probably going to be a little different for every application. Not all applications are going to need a QD tag.

Regardless, the macro is the same:
- Tag an item.
- Scan the tag.
- Upload it into the blockchain network for real-time tracking and traceability.

As you say, QMC probably needs to have the scanner details resolved. Additionally, they'll probably have to formulate the right QD composition for each customer's application, and then prove it with field evaluations and real world longevity/stability testing.

[puravida19]

Or it's a trade secret / IP they don't want the competition to find out about until after contracts are done, at least. If they have to POC and beta test, why would they want to give the competition a hint of what they are doing? I'm not saying that is whats going on now, but it is a good possibility IMO.

Revenue moves the stock, not POC or or betas, IMO.

[RPR]

In that case may be we can have 2 or 1 QD tag like header & line for Company and product. Buyers with Inexpensive ones with phone can scan to check if product is genuine from company and expensive scanners can scan & print at the point of sale by retailers?...