Replies to post #35565 on Meso Numismatics Inc (MSSV)

[cameron86]

I do not think commons of laho will get anything totally separate entity . News here puts the price higher than this.

[apennyortwo]

The difference is LAHO shareholders invested in the RM, therefore should be a part of it. Over $18m dollars in shareholder value when it got halted. All invested because of this deal. Past MSSV holders however did not. They fell into the deal. MSSV was barely even trading (a shell) before this deal. Why should investors who didn’t even invest in the RM reap all of the rewards of it? Doesn’t make sense. 3 way relationship in which all parties should be involved and treated fairly.

[chunky-g]

MSSV was/is nothing without LAHO and the Merger deal! Global Stem Cells Group merger is the fuel that feeds the whole fire!! And the MSSV PR clearly stated "As part of overall transaction with LANS Holding"

[bucks2pennies]

LAHO is NOT the reason for the MSSV pps/share collapse.

But the RM with GSCG benefits you as well as it would have benefited LAHO shareholders IF the RM would have actually happened there. Your MSSV shares would still at the pps level prior to the RM announcement with MSSV included.

Your pps has gone up 400% since and as a result of the RM announcement.

You most definitely should gain from this announcement - but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. LAHO SHs DESERVE a share of the action as well.

It is realistic to presume that you will somehow have the amount of shares you currently own increased to provide a logical value balance taking into account the dilutive affect it would have on your current share count (currently MSSV shares are being bought up at around .06...over 400% gain from what the share price was prior to the announcement).

LAHO share value should also take into account MSSV's pps increase after trade ended for that ticker. If brought forward, our pps should also increase a bit from the price noted at trade suspension.

If managers consider SH interests in continuing to develop the RM then when the final O/S number at time of RM is released, share count and related pps should include 'fairness' factors. If done correctly, BOTH our investment value will reflect appropriate gain. Then we move on from there.

My take is that management will indeed try to do so. The real value added for the both of us will occur as GSCG grows and grows. Good luck.

[Eli-316]

Do you realize that GSCG/LAHO is bringing over 100 million a year revenue.

This merger is the best thing that could happen to/for MSSV.