InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 175
Posts 16498
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2008

Re: Captain OnThe Bridge post# 35565

Thursday, 12/05/2019 3:25:08 PM

Thursday, December 05, 2019 3:25:08 PM

Post# of 50897
LAHO is NOT the reason for the MSSV pps/share collapse.

But the RM with GSCG benefits you as well as it would have benefited LAHO shareholders IF the RM would have actually happened there. Your MSSV shares would still at the pps level prior to the RM announcement with MSSV included.

Your pps has gone up 400% since and as a result of the RM announcement.

You most definitely should gain from this announcement - but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. LAHO SHs DESERVE a share of the action as well.

It is realistic to presume that you will somehow have the amount of shares you currently own increased to provide a logical value balance taking into account the dilutive affect it would have on your current share count (currently MSSV shares are being bought up at around .06...over 400% gain from what the share price was prior to the announcement).

LAHO share value should also take into account MSSV's pps increase after trade ended for that ticker. If brought forward, our pps should also increase a bit from the price noted at trade suspension.

If managers consider SH interests in continuing to develop the RM then when the final O/S number at time of RM is released, share count and related pps should include 'fairness' factors. If done correctly, BOTH our investment value will reflect appropriate gain. Then we move on from there.

My take is that management will indeed try to do so. The real value added for the both of us will occur as GSCG grows and grows. Good luck.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMTG News