InvestorsHub Logo

Plowmaster

12/05/19 1:25 PM

#269742 RE: rushmann #269738

Lol, such bullshit rhetoric. Completely disconnected from the realities of what investing in a growth company is about, how a growth company grows and the nature of this TINY 'market'

’The pps is the objective measure!’ It is actually a subjective measure. It is a measure based on and subject to a number of variables. It is the savvy investor who reviews those variables and makes an assessment. When one reviews those variables and due diligence to see the narrative of WHY the pps is in its current state, it shows FUNN, the company vs the ticker is highly undervalued. Simple as that. The pink market place is fairly limited in the scheme of things: The total investor pool and total potential investor dollars. That makes it some subject to variation. The QB is exponentially wider, deeper, with more reach and more competition for MM’s. During this past year, FUNN has shown great strength that it has not crashed and continues to be accumulated: Despite a stop sign and an influx state of getting through a lengthy and pivotal audit. During all this time, the company continues to grow, in all areas. Also imagine a stop sign pink that has no toxic financing or mass dilution for over a year and continues to have major accumulation support. You just don’t see it, because most pinks are just bullshit momentum plays with no substance. Most Companies dream to be in FUNNs position. It’s just the corporate accounting being implemented so that the audits catch up with all the growth. That is an extremely high class problem to have.

This is exactly why savvy investors have been accumulating for so long: It’s a revenue generating company in the millions not a pump and dump like often one sees in the OTC. When your AS/OS goes down over time while your revenues go up like FUNN, along with all the other markers of success, then one knows the situation is a great investment point.

The arguments for FUNN are backed with due diligence and conclusive narrative. I have yet to see a strong counter against it in either narrative or due diligence.