Replies to post #182602 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Sean Portman]

Great reminder and post

[Liquid1974]

Added on this news... Thx.. DBMM

[skichic]

That’s all great, but what about the $77,000 in assets and 4.5 million dollars in liabilities, of which around $840,000 are convertible notes? I am having a little trouble seeing the good, other than they came current.

[Digra Ive]

Such enormous upside. Easy ?
Hardly believe it able to touch $.05
Despite you trying to make it positive, there have only couple points on your DD list attracting my attention.

DBMM will be MULTI PENNY runner.
My target is $.10 to $.40+ based on DBMM winning above case against SEC and below DD points.
NEXT BIG THING IN OTC. Unlike other OTC companies, below DD points are REAL and AUDITED.

1) Growing social media & analytics company
2) 16 highly educated technology and management employees
3) Half a million dollar in revenue
4) $3+ million in investment
5) Float only 729 Million
6) Float NOT increased in last 3 years and 6 months now
7) Non-toxic funding
8) ZERO dilution
9) CEO, Linda Perry has MBA from Harvard University-Harvard Business School
10) Executive Director, Reggie James is a technology leader. Written 14+ technology articles
11) Certain new significant clients representing a variety of industries were added to client roster
12) Large multinational companies are clients. Mercedes, Xerox, ProCook, Silverstone, H.R.Owen and many more
13) Many IT industry awards including top 10 best social media marketing firms award
14) OTC Markets Reporting status : U.S. Reporting: SEC Reporting

[Digra Ive]

They couldn't increase it because they were suspended.

Float NOT increased in last 3 years and 6 months now

[LOVE*PINK]

Key points: (which counter Division’s Petition points, directly from Judge’s Initial Decision)

1. Pg 2. “The Initial Decision is based on the existing record and the Commission’s public official records concerning Digital Brand, of which official notice has been taken pursuant to 17 CFR, Section 201.323. All arguments and proposed findings and conclusions that are inconsistent with this decision WERE CONSIDERED AND REJECTED.”

2.Pg 7 Para 3. The Judge addressed why Absolute is neither appropriate precedent, nor on point. ”Thus the company’s situation DIFFERS from cases in which the Commission determined that revocation was necessary or appropriate.”

[Think1st]

Ok I am shareholder.
It seems it's up to review till March 2020 .it could be dismissed before then or could drag out till then ..is that correct?