The hypocrisy here is incredible. This comes from a person who claimed to prescribe V for PP (with multiple risks). So it's ok for you to ASSUME but not ok for 'us' to ASSUME.
I take it that you didn't have a CV event, therefore you are taking it for primary prevention for YOURSELF. What happened to what's good for the goose is good for the gander?
Are you the same person who said:
Why aren't you waiting for another 'primary prevention trial to prove it'.