~ Nope', You Are Incorrect', Those Statements Are Applicable Only As Related To The WMI-LT, "Fact" ~
... The WMI Plan 7 Disclosure Statement Supports My Factual Statement' ... My Statements Are NOT My Opinion, ... They Are Process and Plan 7 DS Factual' ...
~ "Equity's" Tracking Markers (ESC Cusips) "ARE NOT" Being Cancelled By The WMI-LT ~
... The WMI-LT "CAN NOT" Cancell Anyone's Plan 7' Tranche 6', Class 19 or Class 22 "Tracking Markers" received for their release submitted 41.6 ... my basis for this "factual" statement', is the Plan 7 Disclosure Statement Itself ...
... The ESC Cusips able to be cancelled by the WMI-LT, are ONLY Those aligned with the Tranche 1 through Tranche 4 Creditor Debt', those that The WMI-LT Paid Off ... NOT EQUITY's ...
~ There Never Was Any “75/25 to the end”, Of All Things WMI, Simply Nonsense’ ~
~ The WMI-LT Was Never Going To Issue Additional LTI’s ~
~ “Eminent”, Distributions Are 100% Class Specific ~
~ Equity's (Class Specific) Received “Tracking Markers”, Aligned ESC Cusips’, ARE NOT Controlled By The WMI-LT, And CAN NOT Be Cancelled By The WMI-LT ~
~ Collins, of Richards, Layton, & Finger, Will Get These WMIIC / WMI Bankruptcy Cases Closed ~
~ Judge Walrath Will Approve “Attachment D”, The ”Proposed Order” ~
~ The WMI-LT Does Not have anything Financially relevant left’ ... it’s over for WMI’s Liquidation Trust’ ~
~ The "Beneficiaries" Being Mentioned By The WMI-LT, Is NOT Any Reference To US’ ~
~ No One Signed Any Contract’, Participants Released To Be Allowed To “Participate”, In Plan 7 ~
Yes, Cusips were issued to identify each claimant but only Equity were issued Escrow Cusips.
Is this true? - I’m pretty sure PIERS received CUSIPS- and if Tranches 1-4 received CUSIPS then The WMILT would not be lying when they say we are canceling the escrow markers/ CUSIPS Because they’re only referring to one through four- The point being we need some sort of mechanism to remain in place in order to Receive these eventual returns
Thank you for finally putting this issue to rest by providing the actual documented proof, AND citing the EXACT clause that backs up your contention therefore becoming PROOF of your position.