This kind of stuff happens every week. I don't see how you can sue someone over their opinion unless you can prove he made false statements within the report for some sort of gain. I'm sure he can justify his price target by increasing expenses, decreasing sales projections, & focusing on negatives like competition or IP protection. Right now everything is just a guess so his opinion is no more right or wrong then the analyst who has a $50 price target.
Not looking to sue. I only asked that conflicts of interest be investigated because as the links I provided show, regulators are aware of the influence that these analysts have on the market and hold them to strict rules.
You can't sue someone in this situation and expect to win. His email to their counsel was pathetic. These people have to stop thinking with their emotions and put some common sense into the equation.
This kind of stuff happens every week. I don't see how you can sue someone over their opinion unless you can prove he made false statements within the report for some sort of gain.